Here is the notice of Liability to Committing Malfeasance addressed to Mark McGowan (the Premier of Western Australia) and Francis Michael Burn (the person who authorised the State of Emergency in WA) that sent via registered post with a signature receipt! If you would like a copy of this letter, download the document at the end of this blog.
5th Floor, Dumas House
2 Havelock Street
WEST PERTH WA 6005
I do not consent to mandating the quarantine of healthy people, mask wearing, contact tracing, PCR testing and Covid-19 Vaccinations, excessive fines and forced medical procedures. It is a directive (not law) and you are responsible for this mandate.
You are breaching your ‘duty of care’ towards mySELF as a West Australian. I am putting you on notice, I do not consent to any procedure to be conducted on my body with lack of sufficient information, evidence and knowledge of the complete efficacy and all adverse events related to them. This does not meet the requirement of full disclosure and is a crime of battery. You are breaching your ‘duty of care’ for me as a West Australian.
This is a crime of Malfeasance, which you are personally liable for.
You have authorised the closure of the Western Australian boarders under a state of emergency, you have forced healthy Western Australians to be quarantined and subjected them to asymptomatic Covid-19 testing, you have mandated the wearing of masks depriving our community of the right to breathe fresh air. You have personally traumatised the population of Western Australia through medical tyranny subjecting them to mental and emotional trauma caused by your actions because one person may have tested positive with Covid-19.
The Western Australian Government is a private corporation trading as the WESTERN AUSTRALIAN TREAURY CORPORATION with an ABN: 22 300 359 323. the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA ABN 122 104 616 and registered with the United States American Securities and Exchange Commission: No. 000 080 5157. 651 and it’s CIK# is 0000805157. The business address is listed as 1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NWC/O AUSTRALIAN EMBASSY WASHINGTON DC 20036.
UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 3: Everyone has the right to life, liberty and the security of person. (OXYGEN IS LIFE)
Article 5: No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
FORCING PEOPLE TO WEAR MASKS IS CRUEL, INHUMANE, AND DEGRADING.
Article 19: Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers. MY BODY MY CHOICE.
INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS
All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.
THIS LOCK DOWN IS A BREACH OF CIVIL RIGHTS!
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
VACCINES EXPERIMENTS, NO JAB NO PAY OR PLAY AND ENFORCED MASK WEARING IS A CLEAR BREACH OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS.
1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
5. Anyone who has been the victim of unlawful arrest or detention shall have an enforceable right to compensation. QUARANTINE AND HOUSE ARRESTS ARE BREACHING OUR CIVIL RIGHTS!
No one shall be imprisoned merely on the ground of inability to fulfil a contractual obligation.
BREACHING LOCKDOWN AND GETTING ARRESTED IS A BREACH OF OUR CIVIL RIGHTS!
1. Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to choose his residence.
2. Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own.
3. The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other rights recognized in the present Covenant.
4. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own country.
CLOSING THE BORDERS IS BREACHING OUR CIVIL RIGHTS!
1. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.
FORCED CONTACT TRACING!!!!
1. Any propaganda for war shall be prohibited by law.
2. Any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence shall be prohibited by law.
COVID IS WAR PROPOGANDA – WAR ON AUSTRALIANS!
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.
Public Health Act 2016
158.Enforcement of requirement to undergo medical observation, medical examination
(1)If an authorised officer gives a direction to a person under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated, an authorised officer or police officer may use reasonable force to ensure that the direction is complied with, including, if necessary —
(a)to apprehend and detain the person to whom the direction applies (the relevant person) and take the relevant person to a place where the person is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(b)to detain the relevant person at the place where he or she is required to undergo medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated in accordance with the direction; and
(c)to restrain the relevant person —
(i)to enable a medical observation, medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out; or
(ii)to enable the relevant person to be vaccinated;
(d)to remove anything (including underwear) that the relevant person is wearing, if —
(i)the removal of the thing is reasonably necessary to enable a medical examination or medical treatment to be carried out or, as the case requires, to enable the person to be vaccinated; and
(ii)the relevant person is given a reasonable opportunity to remove the thing himself or herself, and refuses or fails to do so.
(2)A direction under section 157(1)(j) to undergo medical examination or medical treatment or to be vaccinated authorises —
(a)in the case of a direction to undergo medical examination —
(i)the carrying out of that medical examination in accordance with the direction; and
(ii)the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical examination;
(b)in the case of a direction to undergo medical treatment —
(i)the giving of medical treatment to the relevant person in accordance with the direction; and
(ii)the testing of any sample obtained or taken in connection with that medical treatment;
(c)in the case of a direction to be vaccinated, the vaccination of the relevant person.
(3)If any action taken under subsection (1) involves the removal of an item of clothing —
(a)it must be done with decency and sensitivity and in a manner that gives to the relevant person the degree of privacy and dignity that is consistent with ensuring compliance with the direction; and
(b)the authorised officer or police officer taking the action and any other person present while it is done (excluding any person who is carrying out any medical examination or medical treatment or vaccinating the relevant person) must, if practicable, be of the same gender as the relevant person; and
(c)the number of people present while it is done (excluding a person who is present under paragraph (d)) must be no more than is reasonably necessary to ensure that the direction is complied with effectively and to ensure the safety of all present; and
(d)if the relevant person is a child or an impaired person, it must, if practicable, be done in the presence of a responsible person or some other person who can provide the child or impaired person with support and represent his or her interests.
(4)This section does not limit section 161.
[The ongoing state of emergency means that we are under martial law and the military have extended powers. One case of Covid-19 (Flu) does not constitute a state of emergency in WESTERN AUSTRALIA.]
The United Nations are regarded as military are immune from criminal prosecution according to the Criminal Code Act of 1995.
Criminal Code Act 1995
No. 12, 1995
Compilation No. 134
The purpose of this Division is to protect United Nations and associated personnel and give effect to the Convention on the Safety of United Nations and Associated Personnel.
(1) A person commits an offence if:
(a) the person sexually penetrates another person without the consent of that person; and
(b) that other person is a UN or associated person; and
(c) the UN or associated person is engaged in a UN operation that is not a UN enforcement action; and
(d) the first‑mentioned person knows about, or is reckless as to, the lack of consent.
Penalty: Imprisonment for 15 years.
Penalty (aggravated offence): Imprisonment for 20 years.
Note 1: Section 71.23 defines UN enforcement action, UN operation and UN or associated person.
Note 2: Section 71.13 defines aggravated offence.
(2) Strict liability applies to paragraphs (1)(b) and (c).
(3) In this section:
sexually penetrate means:
(a) penetrate (to any extent) the genitalia or anus of a person by any part of the body of another person or by any object manipulated by that other person; or
(b) penetrate (to any extent) the mouth of a person by the penis of another person; or
(c) continue to sexually penetrate as defined in paragraph (a) or (b).
(4) In this section, being reckless as to a lack of consent to sexual penetration includes not giving any thought to whether or not the person is consenting to sexual penetration.
(5) In this section, the genitalia or others parts of the body of a person include surgically constructed genitalia or other parts of the body of the person.
A person is not criminally responsible for an offence against section 71.8 in respect of any sexual penetration carried out in the course of a procedure in good faith for medical or hygienic purposes.
Note: A defendant bears an evidential burden in relation to the matter in this section, see subsection 13.3(3).
Can you confirm that your choice to enforce mandatory masks, PCR tests, vaccines, excessive force, battery, assault, lockdowns, quarantining and isolation has been thoroughly researched by yourself? Can you confirm with 100% confidence that there will be NO adverse events on my or my family’s health, finances, or mental wellbeing? Note that falsely reporting incorrect data can lead up to ten years of imprisonment.
There is now undeniable proof that adverse events from these types of measures are common. You have a duty of care to me and my family to know the facts and act accordingly. In your position, you either KNOW the facts or you are not lawfully fit for providing/prescribing such procedures. Saying you ‘don’t know’ is not a plausible defence for you in your position. It is your duty.
If I, or my family, experience adverse events on our health, finances or mental wellbeing, we will hold you PERSONALLY liable for crimes of Malfeasance, please see my engagement charges fee schedule.
Without malice, vexation, argument, or merriment, thank you for your time.