Satire · Social Commentary · Because somebody has to say it
Let’s be honest: if Parliament is going to ban anything these days, it shouldn’t be the burka. If anything, they should be handing them out at the door – perhaps in personalised colours, with optional monogramming and a premium “Do Not Scan Me” lining for the security-conscious.
Because in 2025, the burka might just be the last surviving form of practical privacy equipment.
Yes, I said it.
Forget “activewear.”
Forget “athleisure.”
We’ve officially entered the age of Privacy-Wear™ – and nothing beats the classics.
The Joke… Except It’s Actually Not a Joke
The way some politicians reacted this week, you’d think a burka was a weapon of mass confusion. Meanwhile, facial recognition cameras across Australia are clocking millions of faces a day: airports, petrol stations, shopping centres, train platforms, traffic lights – even public bins in the UK (give us time – we’ll get there).
But sure – the problem is a piece of fabric.
Honestly, if the government really wanted to protect the nation, they should be subsidising face coverings.
At this point, a burka is the only thing standing between you and becoming a permanent data point in the national surveillance smoothie.
Perth: The Most Filmed City You Didn’t Realise You Were Starring In
Take a peaceful walk along the Swan River sometime.
Try the footbridge near Optus Stadium – a place meant for joggers, families, cyclists, and the occasional wandering duck.
Count the cameras.
They’re everywhere.
Mounted on lamp posts.
Clustered in pairs.
Dome cameras staring down at the footpath.
Infrared ANPR units watching the road.
Multi-directional clusters bolted to poles like dystopian Christmas ornaments.
All silently recording “for your safety.”
Because nothing says relaxing stroll by the water like being filmed from four angles by a pole doing more data collection than the ABS on Census night.
At this point, even the ducks probably have a file.
And yet Parliament is panicking about fabric.
Australia: The Truman Show With Better Cameras
We’re living inside a high-definition remake of The Truman Show, except:
- the cameras are automated
- the data is permanent
- the tracking is centralised
- the profiling is real-time
- and the dome is everywhere
You’re not just walking through public space – you’re walking through an invisible biometric checkpoint every few metres.
Your face isn’t just a face now. Your face is a barcode.
And every time you step outside, you’re voluntarily scanning yourself into the system.
Enter the Burka: The Accidental Anti-Surveillance Device
When you strip away the political theatre, the burka is one of the only fully legal, publicly wearable items that can:
- block facial recognition
- confuse emotion tracking
- disrupt AI behaviour modelling
- break Digital ID verification
- and short-circuit the surveillance grid
It’s not dangerous.
It’s inconvenient – for the system.
Digital ID Legislation: “It’s Optional… Until It Isn’t.”
While everyone was arguing about fabric, the government rolled out Digital ID legislation – the mega-login designed to centralise:
- banking
- medical services
- licences
- online platforms
- travel
- government access
- financial permissions
They insist it’s voluntary.
Voluntary like MyGov.
Voluntary like QR check-ins.
Voluntary until you actually need to function in society.
Digital ID isn’t a login. It’s an access gateway.
And the burka interrupts it beautifully.
Agenda 2030: When Identity Becomes the System
Digital ID fits neatly into Agenda 2030, with its language of “harmonisation” and “integration.”
Translation:
Everything you do – physical, financial, medical, digital – unified under one profile.
It’s presented as inclusion. It functions as surveillance.
The Online Safety Act: Censorship With a Smile
Then comes the Online Safety Act, a tool that can:
- delete posts
- throttle accounts
- penalise speech
- restrict platforms
- and enforce identity-based moderation
When Digital ID becomes your login to the internet, the Online Safety Act becomes the behavioural control panel.
Together they say:
“You may speak…
but only with your real identity,
approved, compliant, and monitored.”
And if your face is covered?
Suddenly the algorithm can’t categorise you.
It can’t profile you.
It can’t assign you a digital score.
This is why fabric becomes political.
Not because of “security.” Because it disrupts control.
**Final Reflection:
I Don’t Support the Burka – I Support the Right Not to Be Scanned**
Let me be absolutely clear:
I don’t support the burka.
I don’t want it.
I’m not advocating for it.
This satire isn’t about endorsing the garment – it’s about exposing what the political outrage reveals.
When Parliament is more threatened by a piece of cloth than by:
- mass surveillance grids,
- riverside ANPR poles,
- automated facial mapping,
- Digital ID legislation,
- the Online Safety Act,
- and Agenda 2030’s identity infrastructure…
…it tells you everything about where the real priorities lie.
Because the moment your face becomes mandatory for access,
the refusal to give it becomes resistance.
The burka isn’t something I support – but it is something that exposes the truth:
The surveillance state doesn’t fear danger. It fears the unscannable.
By Dawn Kelly, Founder of the Inner Compass – Guiding you to align with the highest expression of your true self.
Recent Comments